CONFLICT MANAGEMENT BETWEEN TANJUNG PAUH MUDIK VILLAGE AND KUMUN VILLAGE IN KERINCI DISTRICT

Authors

  • Nosy Mutia Angraini Faculty of Social Science, Padang State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31933/jige.v1i2.676

Keywords:

Management of Conflict, Conflict, Between Villages

Abstract

This article aims to describe the conflict management between Tanjung Pauh Mudik and Kumun and conflict management that can be applied in other regions in Indonesia if there is a similar thing identified from the factors that cause conflict, the impact of conflict and efforts to resolve and manage it . The study used a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The selection of research informants used purposive sampling (purposive sampling). Data is collected through observation, document analysis, and interviews. While the data analysis techniques are data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results showed that conflict management was carried out, namely making a letter of peace agreement through dialogue with both parties, enacting customary rules that prohibit teenagers from wandering in the village to the neighboring village boundary past 11pm, paying compensation for those who suffered losses, socializing from each village government to the younger generation and parents, activating various activities involving youth in each village, and holding joint iftar between the youth of both parties. This management effort is carried out based on the factors that cause conflict (hatred, impatience, distrust, intolerance, inability to understand each other, inability to forgive one another, and youth mischief) and the effects of conflict (economic, physical, socio-cultural losses) , and psychic).

References

[1] Ahmadi, Abu. 2009. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Setiadi, Elly M dan Usman Kolip. 2011. Pengantar Sosiologi; Pemahaman Fakta dan Gejala Permasalahan Sosial: Teori, Aplikasi, dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Kencana.
[2] Bintasari, Nuriyeni K. (2009). “Gender dan Konflik dalam Politik Internasional”. Pusat Studi Gender SATIAN Prwokerto; Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak. IV (I), 1907-2791.
[3] Bootomore, Tom. 1992. Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
[4] Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Metodoogi Penelitian Kualitatif; Aktualisasi Metedologis kea rah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
[5] Damsar. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: PT. Predanamedia Group.
[6] Demartoto, Argyo. (2010). “Strukturalisme Konflik: Pemahaman Akan Konflik pada Masyarakat Industri Menurut Lewis Coser dan Ral Dahrendorf”. Jurnal Sosiologi. XXIV (I), 1-10.
[7] Dewi, Susi Fitria. 2017. Sosiologi Politik. Yogyakarta: Gre Publishing.
[8] Francis, Diana. 2006. Teori Dasar Transformasi Konflik Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Quills.
[9] Fisher, Simon, dkk. 2000. Manajemen Konflik Ketrampilan dan Strategi untuk bertindak. Jakarta: British Councill.
[10] Gamal Psya. 2009. Negosiasi atau Mediasi, Memilih Pendekatan dalam Menanganani Konflik. Makalah Pelatihan resolusi Konflik. LSM QBar Padang.
[11] Hendricks, W. 2006. Bagaimana Mengelola Konflik, Petunjuk Praktis untuk Manajemen Konflik yang Efektif. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
[12] Lexy J, Moleong. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[13] Miall, H., Ramsbotham, O., & Woodhouse, T. 2000. Resolusi Damai Konflik Kontemporer, Menyelesaikan, Mencegah, Mengelola dan Mengubah Konflik yang Efektif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[14] Mohamad, Zamri dan Mohd Yahya Fadzli Jusoh (Eds). Mengurus Konflik Gaya Streetsmart. Kuala Lumpur: Millennia.
[15] Mukhtar, 2013.Metode Praktis penelitian deskriptif Kualitatif. GP Press Group): Jakarta Mulyana, Deddy. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif; Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[16] Ritzer, George dan Douglas. J. Goodman (ed). 2010. Teori Sosiologi Moderen. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[17] Rusdiana, A. 2015. Manajemen Konflik. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
[18] Rush, Michael & Althoff, Philip. 2001. Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: Pt. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[19] Sudarsono. 2004. Kenakalan Remaja. Jakarta: Pt Rineka Cipta.
[20] Susan, Novri. 2009. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
[21] Susan, Novri. 2010. Pengantar Sosiologi Konflik dan Isu-isu Konflik Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana.
[22] Wahyudi (ed). 2017. Manajemen Konflik dan Stres dalam Organisasi; Pedoman Praktis bagi Pemimpin Visioner. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[23] Hayat. (2013). “Teori Konflik dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Interkoneksi Islam dan Sosial”. Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika. X (II), 268-292.
[24] Hendra. (2013). “Totua Ngata dan Konflik; Studi atas Posisi Totua Ngata sebagai Lembaga Adat di Kecamatan Marawola”. Antropologi Indonesia. XXXIV (I), 15-27.
[25] Ilyas. (2014). “Kajian Penyelesaian Konflik Antar Desa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Kabupaten Sigi, Sulawesi Tengah”. Jurnal Academia FISIP UNTAD. VI (I), 1213-1227.
[26] Ismail, Indriaty dan Mohd Zuhaili Kamal Basir. (2012). “Karl Marx dan Konsep Perjuangan Kelas Sosial”. International Journal of Islamic Thought. I (I), 27-33.
[27] Internasioanl Encyclopaedia of The Social Sciences Vol. 3 (hlm. 236-241).
[28] Retnowati. (2014). “Agama,Konflik, dan Integrasi Sosial (Integrasi Sosial Pasca Konflik Situbondo)”. Jurnal Analisa. XXI (II), 189-200.

Published

2022-07-15

How to Cite

Mutia Angraini, N. . (2022). CONFLICT MANAGEMENT BETWEEN TANJUNG PAUH MUDIK VILLAGE AND KUMUN VILLAGE IN KERINCI DISTRICT. JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL ON GLOBAL EDUCATION, 1(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.31933/jige.v1i2.676